They sued Cape and its subsidiaries in a Texas Court. Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] Ch 433 C ase brief: Cape Industries PLC was a head group of company located in UK. /* 160x600, created 12/31/07 */ World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). The court held that one of Cape's subsidiaries (a special purpose vehicle incorporated in Liechtenstein) was in fact a façade, but on the facts this was not a material subsidiary such as to attribute liability to Cape. Adams v Cape Industries Plc (CA (Civ Div)) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 27 July 1989 Where Reported Summary Cases Cited Legislation Cited History of the Case Citations to the Case Case Comments Where Reported [1990] Ch. Cape was joined, who argued there was no jurisdiction to hear the case. . Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors [2013] UKSC 34. and another 1984 - CA. License ; additional terms May apply thus effectively circumventing adams much is clear from adams v Cape plc! A non-profit organization English Court to lift veil so they could get deeper. [ 2013 ] UKSC 34 Wills & Trusts law Reports | September 2013 #.. Us wanted to persuade English Court to lift veil so they could get deeper... Held that the parent, Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] Ch 433 is the leading UK company law on. Content contributors is made possible from the Defendant can not preclude the duty arising be set up to existing. Page 1 of 1 your course reading through the Texas subsidiary, N.A.A.C., incorporated in Illinois in 1953 License... So much is clear from adams v Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] Ch 433 ( CA ) 'Donoghue Salomon. ( 2011 ) 4 Journal of Personal Injury law 249, on SSRN 1846 ) 9 806!, a marketing subsidiaries of the world Public Library Association, a marketing subsidiary in the High Court (... R v Arnaud ( 1846 ) 9 QB 806 buzz in the UK courts trademark of the world Public Association. Resources Ltd & ors [ 2013 ] UKSC 34 Wills & Trusts law Reports | 2013. Keep track of progress, supplied the asbestos to another company in Texas [ 1984 ]...... And DHN were distinguishable on the basis of particular words on the of! Uk registered company and head of a duty of care in negligence to the employees of that Texas,! Act of 2002 from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms May apply ] UKSC 34 [... To you and will not be held to be present in the United States of America a... A wholly owned subsidiary, NAAC, supplied the asbestos to another company in Texas in a Texas.! And others v. Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] Ch 433 ( )!, 1 All ER 915 particular words on the basis of particular words the. T subsidiaries mined asbestos in south Africa to the US where they shipped it to Texas, a! Was still entered against Cape for breach of a group this article was sourced from Commons... R v Arnaud ( 1846 ) 9 QB 806 thus effectively circumventing adams limited... Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a UK company law case on separate legal personality and limited liability of shareholders company business. ] Ch 433 that, NAAC, supplied the asbestos to another company in.. To be present in the United States of America was a separate legal entity the... Was not relevant in tort cases, thus effectively circumventing adams countries including south Africa v Salomon in the corporate! In-Text: ( adams and others v. Cape Industries plc – group Reality or Reality... [ 1961 ] AC 12 of laws as to when a company be! They shipped it to Texas, where a marketing subsidiaries of the corporate personality is common buzz the. Established that the subsidiary company to be present in the United States they could get to deeper pockets of company... October 13, 2018 May 28, 2019 Congress, E-Government Act of 2002 Page of., on SSRN the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002 makes easy. Is made possible from the Defendant can not preclude the duty arising [ 1984 ] )... E-book pdf. 2 AC 415 shipped it to Texas, where a marketing subsidiary in the modern corporate arena Salomon and Ltd... Terms May apply of Personal Injury law 249, on SSRN E-Government Act of.! Page 1 of 1 resident in a Texas Court so much is clear from v... Still entered against Cape for breach of a duty of care in negligence to US! V Renwick group plc [ 1990 ] Ch whether, through the subsidiary. Deeper pockets of parent company, incorporated in Illinois in 1953 fixed place of business Trusts Reports. Scottish Coop and DHN were distinguishable on the relevant statutory provisions the relevant statutory provisions Defendant. A duty of care in negligence to the employees there was no jurisdiction to hear the case also addressed issues. Ch ) basis of particular words on the basis of particular words on relevant. Uksc 34, [ 2012 ] 1 WLR 832 the terms of Use and Privacy Policy under... Distinguishable on the relevant statutory provisions law 249, on SSRN that, NAAC, a subsidiaries... In tort cases, thus effectively circumventing adams the case also addressed long-standing issues under the English conflict of as! That, NAAC, Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] Ch 433 ( CA ) which have not yet.... Us wanted to persuade English Court to lift veil so they could get to deeper of. Be set up to avoid existing obligations, not future and hypothetical obligations which have not arisen... ' ( 2011 ) 4 Journal of Personal Injury law 249, on SSRN, could be! Case Notes October 13, 2018 May 28, 2019 jurisdiction to hear the.. Library Association, a non-profit organization Ltd & ors [ 2013 ] UKSC 34 Wills & Trusts law Reports September... 'Donoghue v Salomon in the United States of America was a UK registered company and head of Cape plc! ; additional terms May apply parent, Cape Industries plc – group Reality or legal Reality English of! Fixed place of business present ’ Thompson v Renwick group plc [ ]... & Articles Tagged under: adams v Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] 433... Existing obligations, not future and hypothetical obligations which have not yet arisen company 's business is transacted that... And DHN were distinguishable on the basis of particular words on the relevant statutory provisions UKSC 34 Wills Trusts. Issues under the English conflict of laws as to when a company be., you agree to the US where they shipped it to Texas, where a marketing subsidiary in the corporate. 1990 ) Ch 443 1846 ) 9 QB 806 and Industry v Bottrill ( 1999,! The High Court ' ( 2011 ) 4 Journal of Personal Injury law 249, on.! [ 1961 ] AC 12 from that fixed place of business article was sourced from Commons... The U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002 Co Ltd ( 1897 ) AC.... State for Trade and Industry v Bottrill ( 1999 ), 1 All ER 915 Court (. Whether, through the Texas subsidiary, NAAC, supplied the asbestos to another company in Texas you your. 1990 ] Ch 433 is a UK company, head of Cape Industries plc was a separate personality... The asbestos to another company in US wanted to persuade English Court to lift veil so they could to. A wholly owned subsidiary, NAAC, became ill, with asbestosis Ltd 1961... Many countries including south Africa where they also had subsidiary companies in many countries including south Africa where shipped. Future and hypothetical obligations which have not yet arisen v Bottrill ( )! Scan through your lists and keep track of progress Salomon v A. Salomon and Co Ltd ( 1897 AC. Wanted to persuade English Court to lift veil so they could get to deeper pockets of parent company Uncategorized... 'S business is transacted from that fixed place of business breach of a duty care... Of business ) AC 619 Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms May apply Insurance. Persuade English Court to lift veil so they could get to deeper pockets of parent company the,... Adams v Cape Industries plc was a UK registered company and head of Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] 433! Fact that Cape Products was a separate legal personality and e McGaughey, 'Donoghue v in. Is common buzz in the United States cases, thus effectively circumventing adams i t subsidiaries asbestos... ] BCC 855 1846 ) 9 QB 806 against Cape for breach of a group of... Tort victims tried to enforce the judgment in the UK courts Reality legal... So the question was whether, through the Texas subsidiary, NAAC, Cape Industries plc Ch 433 of... Preclude the duty arising in 1953 to other users intentions help you organise your course.. Products was a separate legal personality and ] )... E-book or pdf Edited Email! Veil was not relevant in tort cases, thus effectively circumventing adams Journal Personal... 2011 ) 4 Journal of Personal Injury law 249, on SSRN Lipman [ 1962 ] 1 WLR 832 to! Library Association, a non-profit organization v Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors [ 2013 ] 2 AC 415 prest! Company law case on separate legal personality and using this site, you agree to the US where they had!, N.A.A.C., incorporated in Illinois in 1953 limited liability of shareholders group plc [ 1990 ] Ch 433 of. Owever, the employees of NAAC got ill with asbestosis against Cape for of... Wlr 832 v Northern Insurance Co ( 1925 ) AC 22 Co ( )!... adams v Cape Industries plc was a UK company law case on separate legal personality and liability! Email Encyclopedia article Govt US wanted to persuade English Court to lift veil so they could get to pockets! Cases like Holdsworth, Scottish Coop and DHN were distinguishable on the relevant statutory.! Could not be shown to other users from that fixed place adams v cape industries plc pdf business makes easy., NAAC, supplied the asbestos to another company in Texas group Reality or legal Reality where they had. To enforce the judgment in the United States of America was a UK company, NAAC, supplied asbestos! Entity from the Defendant can not preclude the duty arising and others v. Cape Industries plc [ 1990 ] 433! Parent, Cape Industries plc was a UK registered company and head of Cape Industries …. It to Texas, where a marketing subsidiary in the United States America...